Cases 41 - 50 of 52
American Board of Opticianry, Inc. v. American Board of Optometry
as 1:2013cv00327
Plaintiff:
American Board of Opticianry, Inc.
Defendant:
American Board of Optometry
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00295
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Connor v. National Board of Examiners in Optometry, Inc.
as 5:2012cv00954
Plaintiff:
Dr. Charles G. Connor, Jr.
Defendant:
National Board of Examiners in Optometry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Connor v. National Board of Examiners in Optometry, Inc.
as 5:2012cv00569
Plaintiff:
Dr. Charles G. Connor, Jr.
Defendant:
National Board of Examiners in Optometry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Marietta Eye Clinic, P.A. v. Marietta Optometry, Inc.
as 1:2011cv04427
Plaintiff:
Marietta Eye Clinic, P.A.
Defendant:
Marietta Optometry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv02848
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Von Hase v. Southern College of Optometry
as 2:2009cv02402
Plaintiff:
Erich Von Hase
Defendant:
Southern College of Optometry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dixon v. OK Bd. of Vet. Med. Examiners, et al
as 07-6201
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RAJEANNA DIXON
Defendant:
OKLAHOMA BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY, Oklahoma Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners
Defendant - Appellant:
CATHY KIRKPATRICK, in her individual capacity
Velia L Foster v. Long Beach Family Optometry
as 2:2007cv03426
Plaintiff:
Velia L Foster
Defendant:
Long Beach Family Optometry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
