Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Larrick v. Tuscarawas County, et al
as 5:2021cv00959
Defendant:
Sheriff Orvis Campbell, Sergeant Dave DiGenova, Correctional Officer Julie Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Serena Larrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00075
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Campbell et al
as 5:2019cv02651
Defendant:
Orvis Campbell, LT. Ken Engstrom, Food and Services Director of Tuscarawas County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Simeon Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lichtenwalter v. Campbell et al
as 5:2019cv02492
Defendant:
Orvis L. Campbell, Jay Burrier and Food Service Director
Plaintiff:
Derek Ralph Lichtenwalter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scherer v. Campbell et al
as 5:2019cv01562
Plaintiff:
Jamie M Scherer and Jamie Marie Scherer
Defendant:
Paul Rossi, Village of Port Washington, Ohio, Michael E. Creager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orvis et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp22112
Plaintiff:
Brenda L. Orvis and Jonathan P. Orvis
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fraser v. Orvis Company, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00320
Plaintiff:
Mark Fraser, Mark Fraser and Mark Fraser
Defendant:
Orvis Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Orvis v. Burt
as 2:2009cv10544
Petitioner:
Carl Orvis
Respondent:
Sherry Burt
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Orvis v. Hornbuckle et al
as 2:2008cv11541
Plaintiff:
Carl Orvis
Defendant:
Hornbuckle, DMC Hospital and Does
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Adventure Holdings, LLC v. The Orvis Company, Inc.
as 3:2007cv00711
Plaintiff:
Adventure Holdings, LLC doing business as Parallel 38
Defendant:
The Orvis Company, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Adventure Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
