Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Overton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2026cv02031
Plaintiff:
Sheila Overton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Sims-Lewis v. Gohike et al
as 2:2026cv00732
Plaintiff:
Raymond Sims-Lewis
Defendant:
Cody Gohike, Brandon Harlow #4403, Chloe Caldwell #4457 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Overton v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2026cv00671
Plaintiff:
Bennie Overton
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, RRC Cornerstone/Talbert House, Rebekah Fairbanks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pauley v. Entzel et al
as 0:2026cv00101
Plaintiff:
Overton Wayne Pauley
Defendant:
Chris Entzel, Andrea Burnside, Jason Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Overton v. United States of America
as 26-1742
Petitioner:
MARKEL OVERTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Overton v. Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc.
as 2:2026cv06735
Plaintiff:
Tuwanna Overton
Defendant:
Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Overton v. AFAM Concept, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv06938
Plaintiff:
Twanda Overton
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc., Avlon Industries, Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
