Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Owney v. USA
as 2:2024cv00128
Petitioner:
Terrioues Owney
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate
Fredrick Norris v. Charles Freyder, et al
as 23-1554
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fredrick Allen Norris
Defendant / Appellee:
Charles Freyder, Chaplain, Randall L. Williams, ADC, Owney, Lt. Randall L. Williams & Ester Units, ADC, Lee, Major- Building Security, Randall L. Williams, ADC and others
Norris v. Freyder et al
as 4:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Fredrick A Norris
Defendant:
Charles Freyder, Owney, Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adam Hill v. Dale Reed, et al
as 20-1100
Defendant / Appellee:
Hancock, Mail Room Supervisor, Ester Unit, Mayo, Lieutenant, Ester Unit, Jones, Sergeant, Barbara Ester Unit, ADC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Adam Hill
Roberts et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2018cv02116
Plaintiff:
Dora Rodgers, Jimmy Roberts, Donald Owens and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. Reed et al
as 1:2018cv00089
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Lay, Hancock and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcus Owney v. Jacob Frederick et al
as 2:2017cv06987
Defendant:
Does, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Jacob Frederick and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Owney
Lester v. Ruh et al
as 5:2011cv00227
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Lester
Defendant:
A Ruh, Anthony L Jackson, Alfred J Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vanzant v. Norris et al
as 5:2010cv00363
Plaintiff:
Mark Edward Vanzant
Defendant:
L Norris, W Straughn, S Owney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elzey et al v. River Birch Homes, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv04067
Plaintiff:
Kendall Elzey , Larry Gibson , Percy Gibson and others
Defendant:
River Birch Homes, Inc., Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
