Cases 1 - 10 of 118
Mitchell v. Atchley, et al.
as 24-1101
Petitioner:
CORREY MITCHELL
Respondent:
MATTHEW ATCHLEY and JOSEPH P. LEE, Attorney General
Liang v. Baszucki et al
as 1:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Luejia Liang
Defendant:
David Baszucki, Gregory Baszucki, Christopher Carvalho and others
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv01399
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club and James Lee
Defendant:
Brian P. Lee, Jean Y. Lee and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Mitchell v. Atchely et al
as 4:2023cv03455
Petitioner:
Correy Mitchell
Respondent:
Matthew Atchely and Joseph P. Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Wang et al v. Mhathre et al
as 4:2023cv40055
Plaintiff:
Xing F Wang, 3W Consulting Company and Kathleen P Lee
Defendant:
Nitin J. Mhathre, Seth R Grossman, Robert Marchard and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00974
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Logan v. Cox et al
as 2:2022cv02187
Plaintiff:
Glicenia Carmela Logan
Defendant:
James O Cox, P.K. Holmes, III, David Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Craig Martin v. State Bar of California, et al
as 22-15255
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRAIG KENNETH MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, MARK TORRES-GIL, LUCY ARMENDARIZ and others
McLane, et al v. White, et al
as 3:2021cv00719
Plaintiff:
Jessica L. McLane
Defendant:
David O. White, Steven M. Tupponce, Terry S. Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michael Sullivan v. M. Biter, et al
as 21-16842
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN SULLIVAN
Defendant / Appellee:
M. D. BITER, Warden
Defendant:
MATTHEW CATE, J. CLARK KELSO, D. FOSTON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
