Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Grant et al v. Health Screening Services, LLC et al
as 0:2023mc61300
Plaintiff:
Christopher P Grant and Tymekah Danielle Ferguson
Defendant:
Health Screening Services, LLC, Nick Turner, Labsolutions, LLC and others
GRANT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv50567
Plaintiff:
ANDREW P GRANT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arco v. Reason, Logic & Law et al
as 1:2020cv08726
Defendant:
Chief Maestro Chaven, RTSMediaink P. Grant, CCLN J. Bishop and others
Plaintiff:
The People Johnny Arco and The People doing business as Johnny Arco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arco v. Reason, Logic & Law et al
as 1:2020cv08630
Defendant:
Chief Maestro Chaven, RTSMediaink P. Grant, CCLN J. Bishop and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Arco and The People doing business as Johnny Arco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1932 bv
(PC) Dixon v. Villarreal et al
as 2:2019cv00510
Defendant:
P. Grant, H. Villarreal, B. Schmidt and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Dixon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grant v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv05973
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Angela P Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
GRANT v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv00301
Plaintiff:
MATTIE P GRANT
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grant v. USA
as 4:2017cv00482
Respondent:
USA
Movant:
Gordon P. Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Grant v. Nature Conservancy (THE)
as 1:2017cv00071
Plaintiff:
Roland P. Grant
Defendant:
Nature Conservancy (THE), Michael Raposa, Sherry L. Raposa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
