Cases 1 - 10 of 100
DOSSETT v. FISHER et al
as 2:2026cv00522
Plaintiff:
JALEN DOSSETT
Defendant:
FISHER, K. VINARDI and MAGEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tiffany R. Love v. William Evans et al
as 2:2026cv08146
Plaintiff:
Tiffany R. Love doing business as Petra Publishing doing business as Beelara doing business as Positive Magazine doing business as TRL Media Group doing business as TRL Legal Group
Defendant:
William Evans, Windsong Plantation Homeowners Association, Inc., Dominguez Hills Village Community Association and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hand et al v. City of Magee, Mississippi et al
as 3:2026cv00525
Plaintiff:
Logan Hand and Chad Hand
Defendant:
City of Magee, Mississippi and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Seutter et al v. City of Magee, Mississippi et al
as 3:2026cv00508
Plaintiff:
Angie Von Seutter and Michael Von Seutter
Defendant:
City of Magee, Mississippi, Penny Aguirre and John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Magee v. Martinez et al
as 1:2026cv01349
Plaintiff:
Antonio Magee
Defendant:
Bryant Martinez, Jameson Meilunas, Rachal Rounds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAGEE v. BISIGNANO
as 2:2026cv04553
Plaintiff:
CONNOR M MAGEE
Defendant:
FRANK BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01231
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Pretrial Detainee)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
