Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Brooke-Thodos v. Proctor et al
as 1:2021cv01902
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ryan Brooke-Thodos
Defendant:
P. Proctor, TFC. K. Manuel and TFC. Arment
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hughes et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv02970
Plaintiff:
Dana A Hughes and Gloria P Proctor Hughes
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell et al v. Walter et al
as 1:2010cv00200
Plaintiff:
Patricia Annette Counts Campbell , Lisa Renee Gregory and Tina Marie Shands
Defendant:
Rick Walter, Michael P. Proctor and Ronald A. Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alfred Thomas v. US
as 08-1724
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFRED T. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PETER GILCREST, NATHANIEL P. PROCTOR and others
Annie Smith v. US
as 08-1625
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANNIE R. SMITH, on behalf of A.T. (minor)
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PETER GILCHRIST, NATHANIEL P. PROCTOR and others
Thomas v. United States of America et al
as 3:2008cv00192
Plaintiff:
Alfred T. Thomas
Defendant:
United States of America, Peter Gilcrest, Nathaniel P. Proctor and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Annie Smith v. US
as 08-1415
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANNIE R. SMITH, on behalf of A.T. (minor)
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PETER GILCHRIST, NATHANIEL P. PROCTOR and others
Annie Smith v. US
as 08-1029
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANNIE R. SMITH, on behalf of A.T. (minor)
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PETER GILCHRIST, NATHANIEL P. PROCTOR and others
Smith v. The United States of America et al
as 3:2007cv00371
Plaintiff:
Annie R. Smith
Defendant:
The United States of America, Peter Gilchrist, Nathaniel P. Proctor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
