Cases 41 - 50 of 90
Jiang v. Napolitano et al
as 8:2009cv01403
Petitioner:
Xiu Ping Jiang
Respondent:
Janet Napolitano, Eric Holder, John P. Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patel v. Holder et al
as 1:2009cv01189
Petitioner:
Induben Patel
Respondent:
Eric Holder, John P. Torres, James T. Hayes, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
Bourguignon v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2009cv00598
Petitioner:
Bristout Bourguignon and Bristout Bourguignon
Respondent:
George Sullivan, Bruce Chadbourne, Department of Homeland Sec and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gooden v. Cherry et al
as 1:2009cv00288
Petitioner:
Collin Gooden
Respondent:
Roy W. Cherry, Mary Loiselle, John P. Torres and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Hook v. Holder et al
as 3:2009cv00423
Defendant:
Eric H Holder, Jr, John P Torres, George H Lund, III and others
Plaintiff:
Marc Hook
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01981
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
DIAKHITE v. DECKER et al
as 2:2009cv00550
Petitioner:
MOUNA DIAKHITE
Respondent:
THOMAS R. DECKER, JAMES T. HAYES, JR., JOHN P. TORRES and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
FAYE v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008cv06132
Petitioner:
ADAMA FAYE
Respondent:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, JOHN P. TORRES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MARKS v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv02131
Plaintiff:
ANTOLIN ANDREW MARKS
Defendant:
MICHAEL MUKASEY and JOHN P. TORRES
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
