Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Robinson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv01717
Plaintiff:
Joshua Robinson
Defendant:
The City Of New York,, Police Officer Nicholas Mitchell, Sergeant Darin Lazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lambrix, et al. v. Tesla Inc.
as 23-3780
Petitioner:
VIRGINIA M. LAMBRIX, SEAN BOSE, ANDREW RAGONE and others
Respondent:
TESLA INC.
CRISS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv04246
Plaintiff:
PATRICK DOYL CRISS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker v. O'Boyle et al
as 2:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
William Walker
Defendant:
Jack O'Boyle, Travis Grey and Patrick Doyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Doyle v. Tesla, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01543
Plaintiff:
Patrick Doyle
Defendant:
Tesla, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Copeland, et al v. C.A.A.I.R., et al
as 21-5024
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IKAIKA KAMAI, NATHAN TAYLOR, TRAVIS OWENS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JANET WILKERSON, JIM LOVELL, C.A.A.I.R., a domestic not for profit corporation and others
DOYLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv06291
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK DOYLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOYLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv23556
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK DOYLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOYLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv19786
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS PATRICK DOYLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doyle v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
as 3:2019cv01192
Defendant:
Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Patrick Doyle
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
