Cases 1 - 10 of 17
McLaurin et al v. Bagley et al
as 2:2017cv11263
Plaintiff:
Jack McLaurin and Shane Tomczyk
Defendant:
Dennis Bagley, Marc Keast, Jessica R. Cooper and others
O'Brien v. RGS Financial, Inc.,
as 1:2017cv01170
Plaintiff:
Patrick O'Brien
Defendant:
RGS Financial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
O'Brien v. Boothwyn Pharmacy LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00615
Plaintiff:
Patrick O'Brien
Defendant:
Boothwyn Pharmacy LLC , Louis Micolucci and Lou Chiarelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Valencia #124129 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv02428
Plaintiff:
Gregory Nidez Valencia, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, S Kingsland, Patrick O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Brien et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as SD/1:15-cv-01147
Plaintiff:
Marc O'Brien and Patrick O'Brien
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC. and Syngenta Seeds, Inc.
O'Brien et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv01147
Plaintiff:
Marc O'Brien and Patrick O'Brien
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC. and Syngenta Seeds, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'Brien v. Jim's Antiques LTD. of N.J. Inc. et al
as 9:2015cv81256
Plaintiff:
Patrick O'Brien
Defendant:
Jim's Antiques LTD. of N.J. Inc. and James Alterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fuqua #215717 v. Moody et al
as 2:2015cv01298
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Fuqua
Defendant:
Chris Moody, Charles L Ryan, Unknown Twyford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson #165276 v. Oakland County Circuit Court et al
as 1:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
Samuel P. Pearson #165276
Defendant:
Oakland County Circuit Court, Daniel Patrick O'Brien, Unknown Parties #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Brien v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv03103
Plaintiff:
Patrick O'Brien
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
