Cases 1 - 10 of 79
GODSON v. JOHN HOPKINS MEDICINE
as 1:2023cv03824
Plaintiff:
EVANGELISTIC GODSON
Defendant:
JOHN HOPKINS MEDICINE and PATRICK WALSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Walsh v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv16481
Plaintiff:
Patrick Walsh
Defendant:
Comm'r of SSA Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Baldwin v. TMPL Lexington LLC et al
as 1:2023cv09899
Plaintiff:
Taryn Baldwin
Defendant:
TMPL Lexington LLC doing business as TMPL Lexington, Empire Holdings and Investments, LLC and Patrick Walsh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Adam v. Sitrin et al
as 1:2023cv00448
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adam
Defendant:
Laura Sitrin, City of Newport, Newport Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Walsh v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2023cv12636
Plaintiff:
Patrick Walsh
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline Holdings (Americas) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez v. Guevara et al
as 1:2022cv06141
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodriguez
Defendant:
Reynaldo Guevara, Ernest Halvorsen, Robert Biebel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Flenke et al
as 1:2022cv00731
Plaintiff:
Dawyne Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Ryan Flenke, Anthony Kosmas Glass, Timothy Rubin Bloss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIS et al v. MTN GROUP LIMITED et al
as 1:2022cv00829
Plaintiff:
GUY L DAVIS, TERESITA R DAVIS, AYLA M DAVIS and others
Defendant:
MTN GROUP LIMITED, MTN IRANCELL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES COMPANY, PHUTHUMA NHLEKO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331 Anti-terrorism Act
Walsh v. Macauley
as 4:2022cv10050
Petitioner:
James Patrick Walsh
Respondent:
Macauley and Matt MaCauley
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
