Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Diaz v. Scillia et al
as 3:2019cv01534
Defendant:
Thomas Lattanzio, Daniel Faroni, Armando Perez and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tirado Cruz et al v. Diaz Santiago et al
as 3:2018cv01462
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Bufete Peter Diaz Santiago, Attorney Peter Diaz Santiago and others
Plaintiff:
Caribbean Celular Unlocks, Suhaydee Velazquez Aviles, Conjugal Partnership between Francisco Tirado and Suhaydee Velazquez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Gonzalez (Batista)
as 17-3665
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Marlon Gonzalez, AKA Rey, Deivy Pineda-Peguero, AKA Daivy, Wilfredo Garcia-Quinones, AKA Poro and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Julius Batista, AKA Julz
U.S. National Bank Trust, N.A. v. Helen Diaz et al
as 5:2017cv00554
Defendant:
Helen Diaz, Peter Diaz, Tony Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
U.S. National Bank Trust, N.A.
USA v. Peter Diaz
as 14-4747
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PETER DIAZ
Diaz v. Jackson National Life Insurance Company
as 6:2014cv01706
Plaintiff:
Peter Diaz
Defendant:
Jackson National Life Insurance Company
Counter_claimant:
Jackson National Life Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
Peter Diaz and Johnna L. Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Diaz v. USA
as 1:2014cv01952
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Peter Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ACM Palmyra CFL, LLC v. Diaz Ramos et al
as 3:2012cv01048
Plaintiff:
ACM Palmyra CFL, LLC
Defendant:
Peter Diaz-Ramos, Adnerys Rivera-Martinez and Conjugal Partnership Diaz-Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv01000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
USA v. Peter Diaz
as 09-4449
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PETER DIAZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
