Cases 51 - 60 of 2,176
Petty v. Souza et al
as 1:2023cv00422
Defendant:
Keoni Bryant, Kevin Souza, Voltaire Gansit and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Ray Petty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PETTIES v. AHMAD et al
as 2:2023cv22662
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DEROME PETTIES
Defendant:
OFFICER AHMAD, OFFICER MEADE and OFFICER RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anthony Pacheco, et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 23-1273
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY PACHECO, JEFFREY KING, BRIAN SUTTON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
PARNELL et al v. SCHOOL BOARD OF LAKE COUNTY FLORIDA et al
as 4:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
PETER PARNELL, JUSTIN RICHARDSON, E D B and others
Defendant:
SCHOOL BOARD OF LAKE COUNTY FLORIDA, DIANE KORNEGAY, MANNY DIAZ, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Petty v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv02663
Plaintiff:
Amelia Petty
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Young v. Midland County, Texas et al
as 7:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Clinton Lee Young
Defendant:
Midland County, Texas, Weldon (Ralph) Petty, Jr., Albert Schorre, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PETTY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv33235
Plaintiff:
CLINTON PETTY and CLINTON Z PETTY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(PC) Eslami v. Matteson et al
as 2:2023cv02330
Plaintiff:
Nathan Eslami
Defendant:
G. Matteson, T. Tyler, J. Cavagnolo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
