Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 2,173
Pettis v. AFAM Concept, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv05655
Plaintiff: Marjorie Pettis
Defendant: AFAM Concept, Inc. doing business as JF Labs, Inc., L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Petty v. Hyundai Motor America et al
as 3:2023cv01493
Plaintiff: Brett Petty
Defendant: Hyundai Motor America and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bc Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Alicea et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02482
Plaintiff: Israel Alicea, Leroy Ahnee, Richard Cabbil and others
Defendant: 3M Company
Pettie v. Harpe
as 4:2023cv00328
Petitioner: Cebon Wayne Pettie
Respondent: Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02934
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
(PC) Trujillo v. CDCR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01531
Plaintiff: Larry Trujillo
Defendant: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, N. Malakka, A. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pettis v. Jones et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00458
Plaintiff: Austin Devon Pettis
Defendant: FNU Jones, FNU Smith, FNU Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2319
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
PETTY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15782
Plaintiff: CHARLES PETTY
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PETTY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15560
Plaintiff: JAMES PETTY
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?