Cases 31 - 40 of 3,373
Clark v. Mediation Case Manager, LLC et al
as 6:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Richard Clark
Defendant:
Mediation Case Manager, LLC, Annette Phelps, Christopher Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Phelps v. Warden Perry
as 4:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
Willie C. Phelps
Respondent:
Warden Perry
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jason Tyrrell, et al v. Richard Robinson, et al
as 24-1266
Plaintiff:
JASON ALAN TYRRELL and ALVIN DWAYNE FRAZIER
Defendant:
RICHARD LEE ROBINSON, WILLIAM CHARLES VALKEMA, CRESTON JEROME HICKS and others
Anderson v. The State of North Carolina et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Anderson
Defendant:
The State of North Carolina, The Office of the Governor of North Carolina, Roy Cooper, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowman v. Chambless et al
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Hywel C. Bowman
Defendant:
Michael Chambless, Abby Cassady, Geoffrey Gleitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Pringles et al
as 1:2024cv00856
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Phelps
Defendant:
T Pringles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v. Baker et al
as 3:2024cv00852
Plaintiff:
Kareem Davenport
Defendant:
Sergeant Baker, C/O Suhro, C/O Schweizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Oakland Riders et al
as 3:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Briggett C Phelps
Defendant:
Oakland Riders, OPD, NPD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Smith et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv01470
Plaintiff:
Garry Smith, Eric Law, William Phelps and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
