Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Ziolkowski et al v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01782
Plaintiff:
Christine Ziolkowski and James Ziolkowski
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc., John T. Chambers, Frank Calderoni and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Cinotto v. Bartz et al
as 4:2011cv01734
Plaintiff:
Jean Marie Cinotto
Defendant:
Carol Bartz , M. Michele Burns , Michael D. Capellas and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Cinotto v. Bartz et al
as 5:2011cv01734
Plaintiff:
Jean Marie Cinotto
Defendant:
Carol Bartz , M. Michele Burns , Michael D. Capellas and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Schipper v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv01568
Plaintiff:
Harry Schipper
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc. , John T. Chambers, Frank Calderoni and others
Movant:
Christine Ziolkowski , James Ziolkowski , Jean Marie Cinotto and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Smith et al v. Locher et al
as 1:2010cv00999
Plaintiff:
Phil Smith and Betsy Kirschbaum
Defendant:
Christian E. Locher and Shooting Star, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Romero v. Barnett et al
as 8:2009cv02371
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Romero
Defendant:
Barnett, Hokers, Reagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hankins et al v. Selig et al
as 4:2009cv00323
Defendant:
John Selig, Phil Smith, Kevin King and others
Plaintiff:
Aimee Lynn Hankins and Janet E Sheldon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hankins et al v. State of Arkansas Dept of Health & Human Services et al
as 6:2009cv03130
Plaintiff:
Aimee Lynn Hankins and Sheldon E Janet
Defendant:
State of Arkansas Dept of Health & Human Services, John Selig, Roy Kindel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooms v. Hubbard Construction Company et al
as 9:2007cv80700
Plaintiff:
Walter Brooms
Defendant:
Hubbard Construction Company and Phil Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
