Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Kirkman v. Vermont Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv00261
Petitioner:
Michael A. Kirkman
Respondent:
Vermont Department of Corrections , Andrew Pallito , Rose Jackman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Underwood et al v. Cardwell et al
as 3:2012cv00736
Plaintiff:
Darrell Underwood and Cynthia Underwood
Defendant:
Claire G. Cardwell, Stone & Cardwell, PLC, William J. Dinkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLEMENT v. HAUCK et al
as 3:2012cv05234
Petitioner:
COURTNEY CLEMENT
Respondent:
WILLIAM HAUCK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Defendant:
plc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLAGER v. AVILES et al
as 2:2011cv07553
Plaintiff:
TIWAN FLAGER
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES, PARKS, DR., DR.(un-named) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eugene Lilly v. Richard McKeon, et al
as 11-2482
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE LILLY
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD MCKEON, PATRICIA CARUSO, SEAN LOCKHART and others
HARBISON v. U.S. SENATE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS et al
as 1:2011cv01828
Petitioner:
PAUL RENFRO HARBISON, JR.
Respondent:
U.S. SENATE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS, U.S. HOUSE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Lilly #730472 v. McKeon et al
as 1:2011cv00888
Plaintiff:
Eugene Ray Lilly #730472
Defendant:
Richard McKeon, Patricia Caruso, Sean Lockhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOOTEN v. ZICKEFOOSE
as 5:2011hc02042
Petitioner:
RICKY WOOTEN
Respondent:
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE and plc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MOTEN v. BUREAU OF PRISONS (B.O.P.)
as 3:2011cv00010
Arbitrator:
PLC
Petitioner:
JOSEPH MOTEN
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS (B.O.P.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
