Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Prater-Nunnery v. The Bay at Sheridan Health and Rehabilitation LLC
as 2:2026cv01678
Plaintiff:
Monique Prater-Nunnery
Defendant:
The Bay at Sheridan Health and Rehabilitation LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Prater v. Palmer et al
as 2:2026cv03585
Plaintiff:
Garry Neil Prater
Defendant:
Roger Palmer and Micheal Lyn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv05248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gary Prater v. Jay Hutchings
as 26-5646
Plaintiff:
GARY PRATER, as Widower of Deceased Phyllis Prater
Defendant:
JAY HUTCHINGS, Officer, McMinnville Police Department
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Prater v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 1:2026cv03917
Plaintiff:
Lanette Prater
Defendant:
The Kroger Co., ABC Corp 1-5 and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Ramon v. Prater
as 4:2026cv00851
Plaintiff:
Rita Ramon
Defendant:
Bryan Prater doing business as Charlie Brown's Club
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Bargo et al v. Apple Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv06859
Plaintiff:
Julian Bargo, Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Apple Payments Inc., Google LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
