Cases 51 - 60 of 597
Neal v. Lake County Courts et al
as 2:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Neal
Defendant:
Lake County Courts, Lake County Probation Department, Judge Lesenger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melone v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2021cv02097
Plaintiff:
Joseph Benedict Melone
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Unknown Party, Social Security Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Reardon et al
as 4:2021cv09464
Plaintiff:
Anthony Smith
Defendant:
Reardon and Alameda County Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUNLAP v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2021cv03055
Plaintiff:
ANTTWAINE M. DUNLAP
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES PROBATION DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
William Whitsitt v. City of Stockton, et al
as 21-16774
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM J. WHITSITT
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF STOCKTON, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, FRIAD and others
William Whitsitt v. City of Stockton, et al
as 21-16670
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM J. WHITSITT
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF STOCKTON, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, KELLY MORRIS and others
Valenzuela v. Maricopa County Adult Probation Department et al
as 2:2021cv01718
Defendant:
Katheriene Cohen, Maricopa County Adult Probation Department and Katie Cohen
Plaintiff:
Bernardino Valenzuela, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Whitsitt v. Meeks, et al
as 21-16636
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM J. WHITSITT
Defendant / Appellee:
MEEKS, CLC Administrator, CITY OF STOCKTON, CITY OF MANTECA and others
Joslin v. Arce-Chinchilla et al
as 1:2021cv00382
Plaintiff:
Chase Joslin
Defendant:
Dianna Stephanie Arce-Chinchilla and Ada County Misdemeanor Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
