Cases 1 - 10 of 204
Padilla v. Lumpkin
as 24-10365
Petitioner:
Ismael Hernandez Padilla
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Quine v. Ola et al
as 4:2024cv01202
Petitioner:
Shiloh Heavenly Quine and Rodney James Quine
Respondent:
A. Ola, A. De La Cruz and A. Padilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Padillas v. Bodiford
as 6:2024cv00902
Petitioner:
Roberto Padillas
Respondent:
Scotty Bodiford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Xochitl Padilla-Barron v. Warden
as 2:2023cv06461
Petitioner:
Xochitl Padilla-Brown and Xochitl Padilla-Barron
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Arthur Padilla v. Jason Black
as 3:2023cv01405
Plaintiff:
Arthur Padilla
Defendant:
Jason Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ESQUIVEL-PADILLA v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2023cv00171
Petitioner:
SERAFIN ESQUIVEL-PADILLA
Defendant:
MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Arthur Padilla v. Jason Black
as 2:2023cv06081
Petitioner:
Arthur Padilla
Respondent:
Jason Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Padilla v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv00776
Petitioner:
Guadalupe Padilla
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Gaitan v. Dalesandro et al
as 1:2023cv00926
Plaintiff:
Valdemar Gaitan, Jr.
Defendant:
Samuel Dalesandro, Danielle Padilla, Emilia Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Padilla v. Segal
as 0:2023cv01596
Petitioner:
Darlene Lluvia Padilla
Respondent:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
