Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Doe v. Syracuse University et al
as 5:2019cv01467
Defendant:
Pamela Peter, Syracuse University, Bernerd Jacobson and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
John Doe #1 et al v. Syracuse University et al
as 5:2018cv00496
Plaintiff:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, John Doe #2 and others
Defendant:
Pamela Peter, Syracuse University, Kent Syverud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Syracuse University et al
as 5:2018cv00377
Defendant:
Pamela Peter, Syracuse University, Bernerd Jacobson and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Peters v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv20157
Plaintiff:
Pamela Peters
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyer et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 3:2014cv00260
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Boyer , Larry Trudo , Barbara A Bruce and others
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In re: Beatrice Boyer, et al
as 14-1476
Petitioner:
In re: Beatrice Boyer, Larry Trudo, Barbara A. Bruce and others
Beatrice Boyer, et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 14-1191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Beatrice Boyer, Larry Trudo, Barbara A. Bruce and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BNSF Railway Company, doing business as Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv06498
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Boyer et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 4:2013cv00652
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Boyer , Larry Trudo , Barbara A Bruce and others
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
