Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv01301
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Badeen et al v. PAR, INC. d/b/a PAR North America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv10532
Plaintiff: Midwest Recovery and Adjustment, Inc. and George badeen
Defendant: Renovo Services, LLC, Santander Consumer USA, Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Par North America et al
as 1:2018cv05814
Defendant: Jane Doe, James Burns, Par North America and others
Plaintiff: Cathi Miller
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv02735
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv02681
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PENA v. NEW YORK COLLATERAL RECOVERY CORP et al
as 2:2017cv12967
Plaintiff: MARLON A. PENA
Defendant: NEW YORK COLLATERAL RECOVERY CORP and PAR NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PENA v. NEW YORK COLLATERAL RECOVERY CORP et al
as 2:2017cv08503
Plaintiff: MARLON A. PENA
Defendant: NEW YORK COLLATERAL RECOVERY CORP and PAR NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00446
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CREWS v. AMERICAN CREDIT ACCEPTANCE et al
as 2:2016cv06582
Plaintiff: KANGI E. CREWS
Defendant: AMERICAN CREDIT ACCEPTANCE, PAR NORTH AMERICA, INTERNATIONAL RECOVERY SYSTEMS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-3885
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?