Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Blocker v. Parker-Smith et al
as 1:2021cv04736
Plaintiff:
Antonio Bernard Blocker
Defendant:
Yolanda C. Parker-Smith, Tabitha Pazmino and Craig Runyon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv29804
Plaintiff:
PARKER SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KeyBank National Association v. Parker-Smith
as 1:2020cv00587
Defendant:
Steven Parker-Smith
Plaintiff:
KeyBank National Association, successor by merger to Key Equipment Finance, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
Horton v. Detroit, City of et al
as 3:2019cv13702
Defendant:
Claudine Parker-Smith and Detroit, City of
Plaintiff:
Angela Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Parker Smith & Feek Inc v. Reph et al
as 2:2019cv01456
Plaintiff:
Parker Smith & Feek Inc
Defendant:
Michael J. Reph, Jeffrey A. Colby, Walter R. Winter and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Smith v. Smith et al
as 3:2019cv00661
Plaintiff:
Steven Paul Parker Smith
Defendant:
Benjamin Wilkey, Jhonson and Matthew Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BackGrid USA, Inc. et al v. Michele Marie Public Relations, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv02525
Plaintiff:
BestImage and BackGrid USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Ragdoll Los Angeles, LLC, Parker Smith, Sunchild, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
DEVERICKS v. SHERWOOD et al
as 1:2018cv13451
Defendant:
H. PARKER SMITH, SCOTT D. SHERWOOD and J. DAVID MEYER
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA J. DEVERICKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Farrell v. Parker, Smith & Feek Inc.
as 2:2017cv00637
Plaintiff:
Stuart O'Farrell
Defendant:
Parker Smith & Feek Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
HOYLE v. BATTEN et al
as 1:2015cv02916
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LEE HOYLE
Defendant:
RAYMOND A. BATTEN, SAVERIO M. CARROCCIA, DOUG OSMANDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
