Cases 1 - 10 of 100
MILLAN v. PA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 3:2026cv01447
Petitioner:
MIGUEL A MILLAN
Respondent:
PA PAROLE BOARD and D CLOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Desi Lewis v. Patricia West
as 26-6796
Plaintiff:
DESI ARNEZ LEWIS
Defendant:
PATRICIA WEST, Parole Board Chair, CORRESPONDS, PM, Correspondence Unit and JOSEPH WALTERS, Director
James v. Parole Board
as 4:2026cv00897
Plaintiff:
Albert James
Defendant:
Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orion Mowell v. Rosalyn Cotton, et al
as 26-2444
Plaintiff:
Orion James Mowell
Defendant:
Rosalyn Cotton, former parole board chair person, Layne A. Gissler, parole board vice chair person, Habib Olomi and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANCHEZ v. CLOSE et al
as 3:2026cv01355
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, SUPERINTENDENT DAVID J. CLOSE, LIEUTENANT JODY COBIAN and others
Plaintiff:
RAMON SANCHEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Negron et al v. Bonner et al
as 1:2026cv13159
Plaintiff:
Jose L. Negron
Defendant:
Charlene Bonner, Angelo Gomez Jr., Suzan Colletet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Connelly v. Parole Board et al
as 2:2026cv00201
Plaintiff:
Ryant Connelly
Defendant:
Parole Board, Parole District Office and Parole Officer Lasso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANN v. SAWTELLE et al
as 1:2026cv00169
Petitioner:
GARY MANN
Respondent:
SAWTELLE and PAROLE BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lindsay v. Craig et al.
as 1:2026cv01474
Petitioner:
Wendell Renard Lindsay, II
Respondent:
Warden James Craig, State of Ohio, Richland County Common Pleas Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.