Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Sanders v. Collins et al
as 1:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Gregory Morris Sanders
Defendant:
Ellisa Collins, Paul Flores, Judy Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Flores v. Robert Newschmid
as 2:2020cv00500
Petitioner:
Paul Flores
Respondent:
Robert Newschmid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tennyson v. CoreCivic et al
as 1:2018cv00680
Plaintiff:
Audrey L. Tennyson
Defendant:
CoreCivic , Michael Miller , Michael (I) Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores #070476 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv04506
Plaintiff:
Daniel Paul Flores
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Unknown Joung, Unknown Waits and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Rowe et al
as 3:2016cv03373
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Green, III
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe, Lubbock District Parole Office and it's Employees, David Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Rowe et al
as 5:2016cv00272
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Green, III
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe, Lubbock District Parole Office and it's Employees, David Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. Brown et al
as 4:2010cv01967
Plaintiff:
Anthony Paul Flores
Defendant:
Bobby Brown, John Randell, Troy Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huckaby et al v. Brown et al
as 4:2010cv01830
Plaintiff:
Dustin Ray Huckaby, Anthony Paul Flores and Edward Gonzales
Defendant:
Bobby Brown, John Randell, Troy Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Gordon v. Joe Barnett, et al
as 08-35313
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS ALLEN GORDON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE BARNETT, JOE DUNEGAN, KIM BELTRAN and others
FLORES-JIMINEZ v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv01931
Petitioner:
PAUL FLORES-JIMINEZ
Respondent:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, SCOTT WEBER and FRANK CROSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
