Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Nair et al v. Toth et al
as 2:2023cv00454
Defendant:
John Doe, Alex Toth, Paul Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Jayakumar Sundaran Nair, Rajakumari Susheelkumar, Jayakrishnan Krishnan Nair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00362
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Paul Lee v. City of Huntington Beach, California et al
as 8:2020cv00301
Plaintiff:
Mr. Paul Lee
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 2, Officer Dineen, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00131
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Eastern District Court of Kentucky Central Division of Lexington
as 5:2019cv00404
Defendant:
Eastern District Court of Kentucky Central Division of Lexington
Plaintiff:
Paul Lee Carter, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Garcia v. City and County of Honolulu
as 1:2018cv00100
Plaintiff:
Donna Garcia
Defendant:
City and County of Honolulu, Ronald J. Lombardi, April Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03996
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Lee v. Ackal et al
as 6:2015cv00754
Plaintiff:
Whitney Paul Lee, Jr
Defendant:
Louis Ackal , Lucas Plauche and Lester Hebert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv02020
Plaintiff:
Paul Lee and Andrew Kang
Defendant:
The City of New York , Vincent Candela, P.O. Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perales v. U.S. Marshal Service, et al
as 2:2011cv01621
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Defendant:
U S Marshals Service, Central Intelligence Agency, Stacia Hylton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
