Cases 21 - 30 of 70
Matthews v. Command
as 1:2018cv01080
Plaintiff:
Paul Matthews
Defendant:
Marci Command and Timothy Command
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
John Durant v. Thomas Paul Matthews, et al
as 3:2018cv01194
Plaintiff:
John Durant
Respondent:
does 1 through 10, Thomas Paul Matthews, Margaret Grace Tafoya and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
John Durant v. Thomas Paul Matthews, et al
as 2:2018cv03779
Defendant:
MARGARET GRACE TAFOYA dba Liberty Lawyers San Diego, THOMAS PAUL MATTHEWS dba Liberty Lawyers San Diego, DOES 1 to 10, and others
Plaintiff:
John Durant
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Roberts v. Generation Next LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00032
Plaintiff:
Gale Roberts
Defendant:
Generation Next LLC, Estate of Richard Cook, Katharine Cook Fishman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Baldwin County Corrections Center
as 1:2018cv00059
Plaintiff:
Paul Matthew Miller
Defendant:
Baldwin County Corrections Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doom et al v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04395
Plaintiff:
Christian Matthew Doom , Danielle Nicole Hunley Doom , Paul Matthew Doom and others
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parisi v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00444
Plaintiff:
Paul Matthew Parisi
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., A. Martija, A. Hundley-Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRIM v. USA
as 1:2016cv00689
Petitioner:
PAUL MATTHEW BRIM
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Matthews v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv00479
Petitioner:
Raymond Paul Matthews
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: Raymond Matthews
as 16-12977
Petitioner:
In re: RAYMOND PAUL MATTHEWS
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
