Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Valentine v. Rynolds et al
as 1:2015cv00083
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lee Valentine
Defendant:
Phillip Rynolds, Joe Slocum, John Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valentine v. Boyce et al
as 1:2015cv00080
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lee Valentine
Defendant:
Henry H Boyce, Steve Howard, John Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valentine v. Reynolds et al
as 2:2015cv00094
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lee Valentine
Defendant:
Phillip Reynolds, Joe Slocum, Lisa Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Samuel Petti
as 10-61008
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SAMUEL PAUL PETTIS
Degaule et al v. Bayview Loans Servicing, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00995
Plaintiff:
Jacques Degaule, Degaule Trust and Michelle K. Degaule
Defendant:
Bayview Loans Servicing, LLC, Silver Hill Financial, LLC, IB Property Holdings, LLC and others
Degaule et al v. Bayview Loans Servicing, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00994
Plaintiff:
Jacques Eugene Degaule, Trust Degaule and Michelle K. Degaule
Defendant:
Bayview Loans Servicing, LLC, Silver Hill Financial, LLC, IB Property Holdings, LLC and others
Dunkin v. Petty et al
as 4:2010cv00106
Plaintiff:
Jerad Keith Dunkin
Defendant:
D Paul Petty, Greg Mole, Cale Hopkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petty v. City Tele-Coin Company Incorporated
as 4:2008cv00148
Plaintiff:
Paul Petty
Defendant:
City Tele-Coin Company Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
PETTIS v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv70615
Plaintiff:
PAUL PETTIS and PAUL PETTIS
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., ALLIED SIGNAL, INC., ABNEY MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Martin v. Neff et al
as 3:2007cv03205
Plaintiff:
Pamala Martin
Defendant:
Linda Neff, John Hildreth, Charles Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
