Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Johnson v. Mason County et al
as 3:2014cv05832
Plaintiff:
Peggy Johnson
Defendant:
Mason County , Tom Haugen and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2014cv01606
Defendant:
JOHN DOES NOS. 1-5, Mason County and Tom Haugen
Plaintiff:
Peggy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2014cv01603
Plaintiff:
Peggy Johnson
Defendant:
Mason County, Tom Haugen and JOHN DOES NOS. 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2014cv01607
Plaintiff:
Peggy Johnson
Defendant:
Mason County, Tom Haugen and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blake v. American Postal Workers Union
as 13-4731
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Barbara Blake
Defendant - Appellee:
American Postal Workers Union, Lloyd Somer, Esq., Peggy Johnson, Union Representative and others
Johnson et al v. Dakota Community Bank, N.A.
as 1:2013cv00123
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Johnson and Peggy Johnson
Defendant:
Dakota Community Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blake v. American Postal Workers Union et al
as 1:2013cv06940
Plaintiff:
Barbara Blake
Defendant:
American Postal Workers Union, Lloyd Somer, Peggy Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv07316
Plaintiff:
Peggy Johnson and Roy James Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RICHARD et al v. AMTORG TRADING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv80851
Plaintiff:
EVA RICHARD , KATHEY LEWIS , BARBARA GATEWOOD and others
Defendant:
AMTORG TRADING CORPORATION, ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD, COLONIAL SUGAR REFINING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HORTON et al v. AC&S, INC., et al
as 2:2010cv63559
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HORTON , WANDO HORTON , ELLIS HAWKINS and others
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ASBESTOSPRAY CORP., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
