Cases 1 - 10 of 4,306
Kindred v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Herman Kindred
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID, Erik K. White, The State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gantt et al v. Penny Mac et al
as 1:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Paul Gantt and Edna Gantt
Defendant:
Penny Mac and David Spector
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Gantt et al v. Penny Mac Corp et al
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Paul Gantt and Edna Gantt
Defendant:
Penny Mac Corp, Cades Schutte LLP, Patricia J. McHenry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Gardner v. Rodriguez, et al.
as 24-2760
Plaintiff:
PENNY GARDNER
Defendant:
ISRAEL RODRIGUEZ and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cypress v. Evans et al
as 2:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Penny Cypress
Defendant:
James A. Evans and Virginia Housing Loan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Pruitt, Jr. v. State Of Georgia et al
as 4:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
John Wesley Pruitt, Jr.
Defendant:
State Of Georgia and Superior Court Judge Penny Feeseman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prunty v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
as 5:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Penny Prunty
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Harel Talasazan v. Robert M. Farrell et al
as 2:2024cv01356
Defendant:
Attorney Poonam Patidar, Robert M. Farrell, Maria R. Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Harel Talasazan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gardner v. Rodriguez, et al.
as 24-2418
Plaintiff:
PENNY GARDNER, formerly known as Penny Rodriguez
Defendant:
ISRAEL RODRIGUEZ and STATE OF WASHINGTON, Acting through and doing business as The Washington Health Care Authority
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
