Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 132
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. Young We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv02913
Plaintiff: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.
Defendant: Young K. Michael and Michael K. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
PETA v. Josh Stein
as 20-1807
Plaintiff / Appellant: PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC., FARM SANCTUARY, FARM FORWARD and others
Defendant / Appellee: KEVIN GUSKIEWICZ, in his official capacity as Chancellor of the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill and ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH STEIN, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, INC.
PETA v. NC Farm Bureau
as 20-1776
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellee: GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT, FOOD & WATER WATCH, ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND and others
Defendant: KEVIN GUSKIEWICZ, in his official capacity as Chancellor of the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill and ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH STEIN, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina
Defendant / Appellee: CAROL L. FOLT, in her official capacity as Chancellor of the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
PETA v. Josh Stein
as 20-1777
Intervenor Defendant: NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellee: GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT, FOOD & WATER WATCH, ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND and others
Defendant / Appellant: ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH STEIN, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina and KEVIN GUSKIEWICZ, in his official capacity as Chancellor of the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
Lori Marino, et al v. NOAA, et al
as 20-5151
Plaintiff / Appellant: Naomi Rose, Leslie Cornick, Earth Island Institute and others
Defendant / Appellee: Chris Oliver, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries National Marine Fisheries Service, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Whale and Dolphin Conservation
Collins et al v. Tri-State Zoological Park of Western Maryland, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01225
Plaintiff: Constance Collins and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.
Defendant: Robert L. Candy, Tri-State Zoological Park of Western Maryland, Inc. and Animal Park, Care & Rescue, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Massaro v. Beyond Meat, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00510
Defendant: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. and Beyond Meat, Inc.
Plaintiff: Nazrin Massaro
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
PETA v. Tri-State Zoological Park We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1010
Plaintiff / Appellee: PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS and PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC.
Defendant / Appellant: ROBERT CANDY, ANIMAL PARK, CARE & RESCUE, INC. and TRI-STATE ZOOLOGICAL PARK OF MARYLAND
Interested Party: MARYLAND ZOO
Rowley v. City of New Bedford, MA
as 19-2000
Plaintiff: FRIENDS OF RUTH & EMILY, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: NEW BEDFORD, MA, Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOYCE ROWLEY
Not Yet Classified: ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND and PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS
People for the Ethical, et al v. United States Department, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-12908
Plaintiff / Appellant: PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC., ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, ORCA NETWORK and others
Intervenor / Appellee: FESTIVAL FUN PARKS, LLC, d.b.a. Miami Seaquarium
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and ELIZABETH GOLDENTYER, in her official capacity as Director of Animal Welfare Operations for the Eastern Region of the United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?