Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Diaz v. City of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2020cv03506
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dean Diaz
Defendant:
Paul Garces, Jason D'Amico, City of Santa Clara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Audiology Distribution LLC et al v. Peter Stephens et al
as 8:2020cv00499
Plaintiff:
Harmony Hearing Services, LLC, Audiology Distribution LLC d/b/a HEARUSA, Medplus Health Solutions, LLC and others
Defendant:
CentralComp Services, LLC, Unified Hearing Solutions, LLC, Peter Stephens and others
NASH et al v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2016cv02849
Defendant:
INDIANA STATE POLICE, STATE OF INDIANA, PETER STEPHEN and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH NASH and TAMMY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Harmon v. City of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2016cv04228
Defendant:
City of Santa Clara, Michael Sellers, Mark Shimada and others
Plaintiff:
Danielle Harmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moneeb et al v. City of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2015cv01987
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Moneeb , Muhammad Ikram and Hazakat Ikram
Defendant:
City of Santa Clara, Michael Sellers, Ray Carreira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens et al v. 24 Hour Fitness USA Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv00516
Defendant:
24 Hour Fitness USA Incorporated and Unknown Parties
Plaintiff:
Peter Stephens and Rachel Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Puga v. RW Blue, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv02952
Plaintiff:
Fidel Puga
Defendant:
RW Blue, LLC and Peter Stephen Kratohvil, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Peter Stephen v. Celotex Corporation, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-72095
Plaintiff:
Peter Stephen
Defendant:
Celotex Corporation
AYERS et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv64455
Plaintiff:
VERNIE AYERS, BEULAH AYERS, ST. HILL and others
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, EAGLE PICHER INDUSTRIES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
