Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Miller v. Peter Thomas Roth, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00698
Defendant:
Peter Thomas Roth Designs, LLC, Peter Thomas Roth, LLC, Peter Thomas Roth Labs LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kari Miller and Samantha Paulson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Gonzales v. Peter Thomas Roth Labs, LLC et al
as 8:2017cv01393
Petitioner:
DOES 1 through 10, inclsuive
Defendant:
Peter Thomas Roth Labs, LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Michael Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. USA
as 1:2016cv00917
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Peter Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DELUTIS v. TOWNSHIP OF LAWRENCE et al
as 3:2015cv02390
Plaintiff:
PETER THOMAS DELUTIS
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF LAWRENCE , JOHN DOES 1-10, JANE DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Egan v. City University of New York at Lehman College et al
as 1:2015cv01560
Plaintiff:
Peter Thomas Michael Egan
Defendant:
City University of New York at Lehman College, Jessica Shiller, Joye Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McGovern v. Mississippi Department of Corrections
as 3:2014cv00920
Plaintiff:
Peter Thomas McGovern
Defendant:
Marshall Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baskoff et al v. City of Orange City, Florida et al
as 6:2014cv01046
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. Baskoff and Gregory E. Melvin
Defendant:
City of Orange City, Florida , Frank J. Ross, Kenneth Duane Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas et al v. Hudson City Savings Bank, FSB
as 1:2014cv00633
Plaintiff:
Peter Thomas and Pamela Ochs
Defendant:
Hudson City Savings Bank, FSB
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
US v. Joshua Shield
as 14-6007
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSHUA PETER THOMAS SHIELDS
PETER THOMAS ROTH LABS, LLC v. NOVA CASUALTY COMPANY
as 2:2013cv06489
Plaintiff:
PETER THOMAS ROTH LABS, LLC
Defendant:
NOVA CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
