Cases 11 - 20 of 762
BDO USA, P.C. v. Ankura Consulting Group, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
BDO USA, P.C.
Defendant:
Ankura Consulting Group, LLC and Phuoc Vin Phan
(HC) Phan v. Covello
as 2:2024cv00735
Petitioner:
Minh Kha Hoang Phan
Respondent:
P. Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hall v. Social Security Administration, et al.
as 24-905
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, JENNIFER L. TROUNG, Hearing Office Director and PHAN, Mrs., Supervisor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Phan v. Bird
as 1:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
Tony Phan
Defendant:
Troy Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Huff-McKay v. City of Tacoma et al
as 3:2024cv05104
Plaintiff:
Anthony Huff-McKay
Defendant:
City of Tacoma, Phan Khanh and Khanh Phan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gwendolyn Hall v. Social Security Administration et al
as 2:2024cv00846
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Hall
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Jennifer L. Troung and Mrs. Phan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leach v. City of Tacoma et al
as 3:2024cv05055
Plaintiff:
Ian Leach
Defendant:
City of Tacoma, Khahn Phan, John and Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Williams v. City of Tacoma et al
as 3:2024cv05056
Plaintiff:
Tavon Williams
Defendant:
City of Tacoma, Khahn Phan, John and Jane Doe Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
