Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bhavsar v. Potere et al
as 3:2023cv00522
Plaintiff:
Denish Bhavsar and Spartan Acquisition Corp. II
Defendant:
Matthew Potere, Barry Edinburg, Rodney Yoder and others
Bell v. Sims et al
as 2:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Philip Ryan Bell
Defendant:
Charlie Sims, Terrell Carson and Chenetta Cains
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TRIMBLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv94438
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PHILIP RYAN TRIMBLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell v. Pelton et al
as 4:2016cv00729
Defendant:
Tony Pelton, Freddy Wise, Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Philip Ryan Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryan v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as LAW/6:13-cv-01462
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Donn Philip Ryan
Ryan v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as 6:2013cv01462
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Donn Philip Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Berry et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as 1:2013cv01375
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Rose Berry , James Philip Bettinger Estate , George Blossey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DOW et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2009vv00801
Petitioner:
NICOLE ELIZABETH DOW , PHILIP RYAN TUFTS and ALEXIA GRACE TUFTS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
