Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Osborne v. Meyers et al.
as 3:2019cv00426
Plaintiff:
Phillip Edward Osborne and Phillip Osborne
Defendant:
Shawn Meyers, Pulaski County, Alexander County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards, Jr. v. State of Georgia et al
as 4:2017cv00072
Plaintiff:
Phillip Edwards, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Georgia and Wal-Mart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Phillip Baker
as 16-41479
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PHILLIP EDWARD BAKER
Rochelle Dicks, et al v. Eagle US 2, L.L.C.
as 15-90075
Plaintiff - Respondent:
ROCHELLE DICKS, SHAWANA DICKS, JAMES G. DUHON and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
EAGLE US 2, L.L.C.
Dicks et al v. Eagle U S 2 L L C et al
as 2:2015cv00723
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Dicks , Shawana Dicks , James G Duhon and others
Defendant:
Eagle U S 2 L L C and David L. Ardoin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker v. The United States Of America
as 3:2015cv00042
Petitioner:
Phillip Edward Baker
Respondent:
The United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
James Edwards v. United State
as 14-3762
Movant - Appellant:
James Phillip Edwards
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Federal Trade Commission v. Apply Knowledge, LLC et al
as 1:2014mc07818
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Apply Knowledge, LLC, Dahm International, LLC, Dominion of Virgo Investments, Inc. and others
Federal Trade Commission v. Apply Knowledge et al
as 2:2014cv00088
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Apply Knowledge , Dahm International , Dominion of Virgo Investments and others
Receiver:
Robb Evans & Associates
Counter_claimant:
Ken Sonnenberg , Apply Knowledge , eVertex Solutions and others
Counter_defendant:
Federal Trade Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
