Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Parker v. Warden Smith et al
as 5:2022cv00813
Petitioner:
Shaquille Parker
Respondent:
Warden Smith and Warden Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Pugh
as 2:2022cv00722
Plaintiff:
Shaquille Parker
Defendant:
Pugh, Deandrea Pugh, Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Dunn et al
as 2:2021cv01701
Plaintiff:
Frankie Johnson
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Gwendolyn Givens, Phyllis Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Spangler v. Speaks et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00965
Plaintiff:
Marcus Montez Spangler
Defendant:
Keller Speaks, Randy Brown, Phyllis Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spangler v. Speaks et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00426
Plaintiff:
Marcus Montez Spangler
Defendant:
Randy Brown, Captain Johnson, Phyllis Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutledge v. Sansing et al
as 2:2021cv00226
Defendant:
Tim Pope, Kenneth Peters, Christie Sansing and others
Plaintiff:
Laventra Denice Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mosley v. Cunningham et al
as 2:2021cv00189
Defendant:
Warden Peters, Warden Phyllis Morgan, Sgt Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Fredrick B Mosley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Peters et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv01829
Defendant:
A. Adams, Kenneth Peters, Captain Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy K. Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Peters et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00577
Defendant:
A. Adams, Kenneth Peters, Captain Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy K. Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonard v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2020cv00563
Defendant:
Sgt. Clark, Jenny John, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Jerome Leonard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
