Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Afari v. Piper et al
as 6:2026cv06689
Plaintiff:
Mustafa Afari
Defendant:
Christopher Piper, Aaron Boudrez, Todd Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PIPER et al v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 4:2026cv00160
Plaintiff:
MARISSA S. PIPER
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES, CLARISSA HALLETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2 Job Discrimination
MCCLONDON v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv03902
Plaintiff:
DANA PIPER MCCLONDON
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Andres Galindo, Sr. v. Steve Piper and Sons, Inc., et al
as 26-2092
Plaintiff:
ANDRES GALINDO, SR.
Defendant:
STEVE PIPER AND SONS, INC. and STEVE PIPER, as an individual
Rosas v. Lane Bht, et al
as 3:2026cv00652
Plaintiff:
Yeni Rosas
Defendant:
Yeni Rosas, L. LANE BHT, Dr Cordova and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houston et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv04561
Plaintiff:
Chastity Houston, Anthony Betti, Jeremy Mccurdy and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Elagha v. DLA Piper LLP
as 1:2026cv05435
Plaintiff:
Yasmeen Elagha
Defendant:
DLA Piper LLP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
VELAZQUEZ ORDONEZ v. SHAW-WILDER et al
as 1:2026cv01573
Plaintiff:
JERSON VELAZQUEZ ORDONEZ
Defendant:
DETRA SHAW-WILDER, CAROLYNA DELIZIA SWIFT, RACHAEL LOKOHEN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Barker v. Piper et al
as 3:2026cv00594
Plaintiff:
Robert Barker, Jr.
Defendant:
Lt. Piper, Nurse Piper, Jeremiah Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
