Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Peizer v. Plowden
as 3:2026cv01231
Plaintiff:
Terren Peizer
Defendant:
Sierra Plowden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plowden v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv10793
Plaintiff:
Shamal Plowden
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plowden v. USA
as 1:2025cv01831
Petitioner:
Melvin Plowden
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Mitchem-Green v. Spencer et al
as 3:2025cv01174
Plaintiff:
Tracie Mitchem-Green
Defendant:
James Spencer, Hutchen's Law Firm, Richardson Plowden & Robinson Law Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Adams et al v. 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2025cv12447
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams, Toby Albritton, Heidi Alvarez and others
Defendant:
AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Amerex Corporation, Archroma U.S. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hill v. Verizon Communications, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv05297
Plaintiff:
Teresa Hill
Defendant:
Verizon Communications, Inc., Verizon Wireless Services, LLC, Cellco Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151 Communications Act
Garrett Cook v. Micheal Brooks, et al
as 25-11869
Plaintiff:
GARRETT M. COOK
Defendant:
MICHEAL BROOKS, MARK DAINTY, DINA RUSSELL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06205
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Kathy Reaves v. Patrick Blanchard
as 24-1846
Defendant:
DIRECTOR SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, CHARLES MICHAEL DICKENS, RICHARDSON PLOWDEN, Law Firm and others
Plaintiff:
KATHY REAVES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05866
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
