Cases 1 - 10 of 595
Richardson v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv03518
Defendant:
Clayton County City Council, Officer J. Carey, Judge Cowen and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Emmanuel Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ponder v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
as 6:2024cv04331
Plaintiff:
Bruce E Ponder
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Ponder v. Orsini
as 2:2024cv03742
Plaintiff:
Damien Howard Ponder
Defendant:
Kisha Orsini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Ponder v. Murphy
as 2:2024cv03743
Defendant:
Matthew Murphy
Plaintiff:
Damien Howard Ponder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Ponder v. Selhorst
as 2:2024cv03744
Plaintiff:
Damien Howard Ponder
Defendant:
James Selhorst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Ponder v. Cramblett
as 2:2024cv03745
Defendant:
Todd Cramblett
Plaintiff:
Damien Howard Ponder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Ponder v. Walker
as 2:2024cv03746
Plaintiff:
Damien Howard Ponder
Defendant:
Zachary A. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ponder v. Columbus Police Department
as 2:2024cv03747
Plaintiff:
Damien Howard Ponder
Defendant:
Columbus Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Ponder v. US Attorney et al
as 3:2024cv04243
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons at the Western Regional Office in Dublin, California, US Attorney General and US Attorney
Plaintiff:
Ms. Evie Ponder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Parra et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv03939
Plaintiff:
Alfred Burdick, Humberto Quinones, Robert Pell and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
