Cases 1 - 10 of 548
Ponder
as 0:2023mc60899
Plaintiff:
Josephine Ponder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Ponder v. Cohen
as 2:2023cv01924
Petitioner:
Bobby Ponder
Respondent:
Warden Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rollins v. Montes et al
as 3:2023cv00351
Plaintiff:
Evan Rollins
Defendant:
Montes, Hayden, Boicourt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathaniel Rice v. Richard Jones, et al
as 23-3373
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL D. RICE
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF RICHARD K. JONES, WARDEN/CAPTAIN NICK FISHER, LIEUTENANT ADAMS and others
Alfred McZeal Jr. et al v. HSBC Bank USA National Association et al
as 2:2023cv03088
Plaintiff:
Alfred McZeal, Jr, Jose R. Solano, Vlen Thi Ho and others
Defendant:
HSBC Bank USA National Association, McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce LLP, Nabeel Zuberi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ponder et al v. Allstate Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv01245
Plaintiff:
Vernon John Ponder, Jr. and Betty Ponder
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
JOHNSON v. GREEN et al
as 5:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
MILTON KENT JOHNSON
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT GREEN, LIEUTENANT CALLWELL, LIEUTENANT HOLIMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: General Motors, LLC
as 23-104
Petitioner:
In re: GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
Respondent:
DENNIS SPEERLY, JOSEPH SIERCHIO, DARRIN DEGRAND and others
PONDER v. USA
as 1:2023cv00290
Petitioner:
JIMIQUE RONSARD PONDER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ponder et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2023cv16406
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Ponder and Vinson Gregg
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline Holdings (Americas) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
