Cases 1 - 10 of 16
National Institute of Family and Life Advocates et al v. Clark et al
as 2:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
National Institute of Family and Life Advocates, Aspire Together, Inc. doing business as Aspire Now and Branches Pregnancy Resource Center, Inc.
Defendant:
Charity Clark, Sarah Copeland Hanzas, Kevin Rushing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vincent Boyd v. Pregnancy Resource Center, et al
as 23-1221
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINCENT W. BOYD
Defendant / Appellee:
PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER and PFIZER, INCORPORATED
Planned Parenthood MN, ND, SD, et al v. Kristi Noem, et al
as 21-2922
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, Sara A. Traxler, M.D. and Sarah A. Traxler, M.D.
Defendant / Appellant:
Kimberley Malsam-Rysdon, Secretary of Health, Department of Health, in her official capacity, Kristi Noem, Governor, in her official capacity, Jason Ravnsborg, Attorney General, in his official capacity and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Alpha Center and Black Hills Crisis Pregnancy Center, doing business as Care Net Pregnancy Resource Center
Planned Parenthood MN, ND, SD, et al v. Alpha Center, et al
as 21-2913
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, Sara A. Traxler, M.D. and Sarah A. Traxler, M.D.
Defendant:
Kristi Noem, Governor, in her official capacity, Jason Ravnsborg, Attorney General, in his official capacity, Kimberley Malsam-Rysdon, Secretary of Health, Department of Health, in her official capacity and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Alpha Center and Black Hills Crisis Pregnancy Center, doing business as Care Net Pregnancy Resource Center
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01868
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boyd v. Pregnancy Resource Center et al
as 3:2019cv00137
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc and Pregnancy Resource Center
Plaintiff:
Vincent W Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
A Hand of Hope Pregnancy Resource Center v. City of Raleigh
as 5:2016cv00746
Plaintiff:
A Hand of Hope Pregnancy Resource Center
Defendant:
City of Raleigh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NIFLA, et al v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 16-55249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FAMILY AND LIFE ADVOCATES, a Virginia corporation, DBA NIFLA, PREGNANCY CARE CENTER, a California corporation, DBA Pregnancy Care Clinic and FALLBROOK PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER, a California corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
KAMALA HARRIS, in her official capacity as Attorney General for the State of California, THOMAS MONTGOMERY, in his official capacity as County Counsel for San Diego County, MORGAN FOLEY, in his official capacity as City Attorney for the City of El Cajon, CA and others
Amicus Curiae:
JUSTICE AND FREEDOM FUND, PHYSICIANS FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH and INFORMATION SOCIETY PROJECT AT YALE LAW SCHOOL
National Institute of Family and Life Advocates et al v. Harris et al
as 3:2015cv02277
Plaintiff:
National Institute of Family and Life Advocates , Pregnancy Care Center and Fallbrook Pregnancy Resource Center
Defendant:
Kamala Harris , Thomas Montgomery , Morgan Foley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gretchen Stuart v. Janice Huff
as 12-1052
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GRETCHEN S. STUART, MD, on behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions, JAMES R. DINGFELDER, MD, on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions, DAVID A. GRIMES, MD, on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions and others
Defendant:
JANICE E. HUFF, MD, in her official capacity as President of the North Carolina Medical Board and her employees, agents and successors, ROY COOPER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of North Carolina and his employees, agents and successors, LANIER M. CANSLER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services an his employees, agents and successors and others
Appellant:
JOHN M. THORP, JR., MD, GREGORY J. BRANNON, MD, CHIMERE COLLINS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
