Cases 1 - 10 of 22
The Continental Insurance Company v. Providence Washington Insurance Company et al
as 1:2024cv03197
Plaintiff:
The Continental Insurance Company, as successor in interest to certain rights and liabilities of Harbor Insurance Company and Buffalo Reinsurance Company
Defendant:
Providence Washington Insurance Company, as successor in interest by way of merger to Seaton Insurance Company, f/k/a Unigard Security Insurance Company, f/k/a Unigard Mutual Insurance Company, Assicurazioni Generali, SPA, Harper Insurance Limited, f/k/a Turegum Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Emhart Industries, Inc. v. New England Container Company, Inc et al
as 1:2006cv00218
Plaintiff:
Emhart Industries, Inc
Counter Claimant:
New England Container Company, Inc, Black & Decker Inc., Organic Dyestuffs Corp. and others
Defendant:
Providence Washington Insurance Company, Inc., Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, United States Department of the Navy and others
Counter Defendant:
United States Department of the Air Force
Cross Claimant:
The United States of America and Black & Decker, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Induplate Inc, Eli Lilly and Company, Univar USA, Inc. and others
4Th Party Plaintiff:
BASF Corp.
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Black & Decker Inc
4Th Party Defendant:
ConocoPhillips Company and Rohm and Haas Company
Cross Defendant:
BNS, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Original Bradford Soap Works, Inc. n/k/a Bradford Soap International, Inc, Eastern Color & Chemical Co, Teknor-Apex and others
Petitioner:
Rhodes Technologies, Inc., The Dow Chemical Company and Win Noren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
First State Insurance Company v. XTRA Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
First State Insurance Company
Defendant:
XTRA Corporation, Xtra Intermodal, Inc., X-L-Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Terrance Irby v. Clifford Johnson, et al
as 22-35033
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE JON IRBY
Defendant / Appellee:
CLIFFORD JOHNSON, Doctor, Clallam Bay Corrections Center, STEPHEN SINCLAIR, Former Secretary, Department of Corrections, CHERYL STRANGE, Secretary, Department of Corrections and others
Kyntrel Jackson v. Stephen Sinclair, et al
as 21-35697
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KYNTREL TREVYONE JACKSON, AKA Sinister Daevayasnaham God
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN SINCLAIR, Secretary of the Department of Corrections, TIMOTHY THRASHER, Department of Corrections Intensive Management Unit Manager, PALMER, Medical Provider, Washington Corrections Center and others
Emhart Industries, et al v. CNA Holdings LLC, et al
as 19-1563
3Rd Party Defendant:
ROHM & HAAS COMPANY, UNILEVER, BNS LLC and others
Defendant:
NEW ENGLAND CONTAINER COMPANY INC, ROBERT M. GATES, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Defense, MICHAEL B. DONLEY, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Air Force and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EMHART INDUSTRIES, INC. and STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, by and through the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management
Defendant / Appellee:
US NAVY, US DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNITED STATES and others
Interested Party:
DOW INC., f/k/a Dow Chemical Company, RHODES TECHNOLOGIES INC and WIN NOREN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv05648
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Crowe v. Harris et al
as 2:2018cv02886
Defendant:
Female Nurse Moore, Mitchell, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Neal Crowe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv05638
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv05637
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
