Cases 1 - 10 of 4,631
Greenbrier Hotel Corporation et al v. Carter Bank & Trust et al
as 4:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Greenbrier Hotel Corporation, James C. Justice Companies, Inc., Twin Fir Estates, LLC and others
Defendant:
Carter Bank & Trust, Carter Bankshares, Inc., Litz H. Van Dyke and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1972 Typing Arrangement Act
Mitchell v. CDCR Director et al
as 3:2024cv01080
Petitioner:
Kenyatta Q. Mitchell
Respondent:
CDCR Director, C. Pfieffer and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IN RE: 23ANDME, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
as 3:2024md03098
Defendant:
23andMe, Inc. and 23ANDME Holding Co
Plaintiff:
Michele Bacus, Paula Kleynburd, Camie Picha and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Robinson v. Terry et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Defendant:
Alcornelia Terry, John Q. Hamm and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EnchantedMob, Inc. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv03091
Plaintiff:
EnchantedMob, Inc. and Mob Entertainment, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, QZPXD, R2m4o7U49M0c2i1Y and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Petteway v. Parsons et al
as 3:2024cv00763
Plaintiff:
Christopher Q. Petteway
Defendant:
Parsons, Yasdel Moya, Landolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
