Cases 1 - 10 of 297
Michael Dobson v. Dr. Thompson
as 24-6403
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DOBSON
Defendant:
DR. THOMPSON, HAROLD W. CLARKE, STEVEN HERRICK and others
Cecil Quinn, Jr. v. Mark Hayes
as 24-6248
Plaintiff:
CECIL JEROME QUINN, JR.
Defendant:
MARK J. HAYES, HOPE M. BLACKLEY, GAIL MOFFITT and others
Cecil Quinn, Jr. v. State of South Carolina Marshals
as 24-6249
Plaintiff:
CECIL JEROME QUINN, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA MARSHALS, 7th Judicial, Spartanburg, AGENT DILLION, 7th Judicial Parole Officer, WARDEN ROBERT MICHAEL, Stevenston, III and others
McCall v. The State
as 1:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Quinn McCall
Defendant:
The State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Quinn v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Linda Quinn
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gordon et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00399
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Eliot Gordon, Keith Eugene Mokher, Christopher Mongillo and others
Petitioner:
Lawrence Pierson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Crawley v. White et al
as 7:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Cordero Crawley
Defendant:
Rick White, Quinn Reynolds and Nicholas Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wartak v. CBC Operations Group, LLC et al
as 6:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Seth Wartak
Defendant:
CBC Operations Group, LLC doing business as Cold Bore Capital, Sergio Zepeda, Matthew Schachman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
DAY v. USA
as 1:2024cv00014
Petitioner:
WILLIAM QUINN DAY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
