Cases 1 - 10 of 280
Iotova v. Metropolitan Detention Center
as 24-1048
Petitioner:
ANTOANETA IOTOVA
Respondent:
Warden HERMAN E. QUAY, Unit Manager MYRNA BRIDGES, Officer KEISHA SPIVEY and others
United States of America v. Phipps
as 24-2196
Defendant:
QUAY PHIPPS and Quay Alan Phipps
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Jaquate Simpson
as 24-4073
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAQUATE SIMPSON, a/k/a Quay, a/k/a J, a/k/a Stacks, a/k/a Predator
Gant v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv08382
Plaintiff:
Keith Gant
Defendant:
United States of America, Warden Herman E. Quay, Dr. Bruce Bialor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
TJ Biggz LLC et al v. Brainova, LLC et al
as 6:2023cv01904
Defendant:
Quais Sarway, Up Brands, Brainova, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TJ Biggz LLC and Matthew Morris, Jr.
Not Classified By Court:
Lawrence H. Kolin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Sawyer v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07783
Plaintiff:
Quay Sawyer
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
QUAY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv16925
Plaintiff:
KAREN QUAY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Rodriguez v. Quay
as 1:2023cv00352
Petitioner:
Isaias Rodriguez
Respondent:
Herman Quay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
