Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Noel v. Romelus, et al
as 23-2058
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD A. NOEL, on behalf of himself and A.G.N. and B.M.N.
Defendant:
BARTHINE ROMELUS, PAUL M. CRONAN, BRAILEY E. NEWTON and others
Meehan v. Quicken Loans, Inc.
as 22-1147
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHARON MEEHAN
Defendant / Appellee:
QUICKEN LOANS, INC.
Quicken Loans Inc. v. Mason Dixon Contracting, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00089
Plaintiff:
Quicken Loans Inc.
Defendant:
Andrew M. Dixon and Mason Dixon Contracting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meehan v. Quicken Loans, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00560
Defendant:
Quicken Loans, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sharon Meehan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Quicken Loans Inc. v. RE/MAX, LLC
as 1:2016cv02696
Plaintiff:
Quicken Loans Inc.
Defendant:
RE/MAX, LLC
Counter_claimant:
RE/MAX, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Quicken Loans Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quicken Loans Inc. v. RE/MAX, LLC
as 2:2016cv13233
Plaintiff:
Quicken Loans Inc.
Defendant:
RE/MAX, LLC
Counter_claimant:
RE/MAX, LLC
Counter_defendant:
RE/MAX, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goodridge v. Quicken Loans Inc et al
as 1:2016cv03982
Plaintiff:
Franklyn Dennis Goodridge
Defendant:
Quicken Loans Inc, Richard Chyette, Phillip Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
VILINSKY et al v. QUICKEN LOANS, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv04363
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY VILINSKY and PNINA VILINSKY
Defendant:
QUICKEN LOANS, INC., CITIMORTGAGE INC. , PENNYMAC CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman et al v. Quicken Loans, Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv00068
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. Fluharty , D. Kevin Coleman and Diane M. Coleman
Defendant:
Quicken Loans, Inc. , Title Source, Inc. and Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Kevin Schriener v. Quicken Loans, Inc.
as 13-1367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kevin L. Schriener
Defendant - Appellee:
Quicken Loans, Inc.
Defendant:
Wolters Kluwer Financial Services, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
