Cases 31 - 40 of 4,257
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00077
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cecil Quinn, Jr. v. Mark Hayes
as 24-6248
Plaintiff:
CECIL JEROME QUINN, JR.
Defendant:
MARK J. HAYES, HOPE M. BLACKLEY, GAIL MOFFITT and others
Cecil Quinn, Jr. v. State of South Carolina Marshals
as 24-6249
Plaintiff:
CECIL JEROME QUINN, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA MARSHALS, 7th Judicial, Spartanburg, AGENT DILLION, 7th Judicial Parole Officer, WARDEN ROBERT MICHAEL, Stevenston, III and others
Caraffa v. Quinn, et al.
as 24-1561
Plaintiff:
ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA
Defendant:
T. QUINN, STATE OF ARIZONA, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS REHABILITATION AND REENTRY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10653
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Caraffa v. Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, et al.
as 24-1476
Plaintiff:
ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA
Defendant:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS REHABILITATION AND REENTRY, UNKNOWN PARTIES, Employees of ADCRR, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Lettieri v. Department of Justice
as 24-676
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. LETTIERI, (John Doe)
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, WYOMING COUNTY SHERIFFS and others
Quinn, Jr v. Walmart et al
as 3:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Michael Quinn, Jr
Defendant:
Walmart and Hilary Bond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caraffa v. Quinn, et al.
as 24-1416
Plaintiff:
ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA
Defendant:
T. QUINN, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS REHABILITATION AND REENTRY, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
