Cases 11 - 20 of 158
Collins v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Charlie R. Collins, Jr.
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1619
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ISRAEL v. BARNETT et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
CONNIE RAY ISRAEL
Defendant:
T BARNETT, L THOMAS and R COLLINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. HERNANDEZ-PEREZ ET AL
as 3:2022cv07534
Defendant:
E HERNANDEZ-PEREZ, Michael R Collins, Luis Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Horne et al
as 7:2022cv00263
Plaintiff:
Dominique Herman Adams
Defendant:
Johnathan S. Horne, Daniel A. Rollins, Daniel C. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oregon JV LLC v. Advance Investment Corp et al
as 3:2022cv00337
Plaintiff:
Oregon JV LLC
Defendant:
Advance Investment Corp an Oregon limited liability company doing business as AIC, Austin L. Walker, Anthony J. Favreau and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Rivera-Olvera v. Kegley et al
as 7:2021cv00605
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Rivera-Olvera
Defendant:
R. Kegley, Douglas R. Barton and Larry R. Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradshaw v. Annucci et al
as 6:2021cv06604
Plaintiff:
Jay Bradshaw
Defendant:
Piccolo, Hill, S White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Collins et al
as 1:2021cv05040
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
James R. Collins and Robert F DiMeo
Klaskin v. The MITRE Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv11452
Plaintiff:
Jill Klaskin
Defendant:
The MITRE Corporation, MITRE Board of Trustees, Jason Providakes and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
