Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Calloway v. Mount Rainer et al
as 1:2024cv00654
Plaintiff:
Audrey R. Calloway
Defendant:
City of Mount Rainer, Celina Benitez and Kamali Kourosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Calloway v. Mount Rainier et al
as 8:2024cv00654
Plaintiff:
Audrey R. Calloway
Defendant:
City of Mount Rainier, Celina Benitez and Kamali Kourosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Malachowski v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 5:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
Marcel Malachowski
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security, R Calloway, FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CALLOWAY v. RITE WAY ANIMAL REMOVAL LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL R CALLOWAY
Defendant:
RITE WAY ANIMAL REMOVAL LLC and OMAR HASSAN
Williamson v. Payne et al
as 4:2020cv01077
Defendant:
J Shipman, Motten, Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony B Williamson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faulkner v. Gomez et al
as 1:2017cv04286
Plaintiff:
Marvin Faulkner
Defendant:
Bryan Gomez, Anna M. Loftus, Pierce & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Buckner v. Clowers et al
as 5:2015cv00088
Plaintiff:
Roger Buckner
Defendant:
W Clowers, V Scroggins, Amanda Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1603
Claimant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
FTC v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., et al
as 12-55209
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Movant - Appellant:
DAVID KISSI
Claimant:
ERIC R. CALLOWAY
Defendant:
COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS INC., a corporation and BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING LP, a limited partnership
Saeturn v. Calloway et al
as 2:2010cv03444
Petitioner:
Jio Saeturn
Defendant:
R Calloway, L Heffner, J. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
